Showing posts with label innovation. Show all posts
Showing posts with label innovation. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Teach this old dog some new tricks

A dog working on a laptop computer
Dog working on laptop
©KariDesign, Fotolia

Learning to program for the first time at age 51 isn't easy, especially when you weren't a dazzling success in high school subjects that involved math, science and problem solving. Don’t misunderstand me. I excelled in my undergraduate and graduate studies, but I took subjects I understood almost intrinsically from my youth up. They didn't require me to leave my comfort zone to the extent I am leaving it now.
 
Computer science is no more challenging than my previous work. After all, it's not everyone who can sit through several years of music theory at the undergraduate and graduate level, and use it to create original compositions. Just the same, I'm challenging my mind in new ways, and I suspect this investment will eventually pay off.
An old dog shaking a hand
Old dog shaking a hand
©fotowebbox, Fotolia

Speaking of science, they say you add more grooves to your brain with everything you learn. I’d like to see if my brain has become any groovier since starting this course. If I could visualize it, I'd also love to see the new synaptic connections I've developed since taking on computer science. So far, the best lesson I’ve learned is that an old dog can learn new tricks after all.

As our economy continues to recover, the importance of adding new skills will increase. Whether we’re welders or physicians, we’ll have to augment our core competencies with evolving knowledge and emerging technical skills. To be seen as indispensable, most of us will have to become resourceful problem solvers.

It’s no longer a secret that almost every modern career is either partially or totally vulnerable to change. No one is safe. Part of the problem is outsourcing. Companies want to pay as little as possible to get the job done. They don’t want to pay for benefits. The idea of seniority and automatic pay raises is no longer sacred. Here’s what they’re saying, “I love what you did yesterday, but now I need something new. By the way, can you do it with less? If not, I need someone who can.”

Another part of the equation is technology. Repetitive tasks weren’t just time consuming; they were expensive. Moreover, they were subject to human error. By contrast, stabilized computer programs removed miscalculations and mistakes. Consequently, companies replaced human effort with automation immediately after the technology behind it became inexpensive.

Two dogs: one using a stethoscope; the other using a telephone
Dogs using human technology
©Roger costa Morera, Fotolia

Outsourcing and automation have driven many careers into obsolescence, not just in the United States, but around the world. It may seem cruel, but there is no end in sight for these trends. Many long-term careers are now exclusively the domain of computers, robots and programs. To overcome the double-edged sword of innovation, we’ll have to forge new careers and industries instead of falling back on traditional jobs. Future occupations must take advantage of our unique, heuristic capabilities as human beings.

A lightbulb breaking out of a box amidst a sea of boxes
Thinking outside the box
©masterzphotofo, Fotolia

As intimidating as progress may seem, it is no match for the human mind. The way to overcome this threat is to adapt the latest innovations to new uses. It’s time to think outside the box.

Note: All images in this blog are licensed to Bill Graham by Fotolia.

Monday, April 2, 2012

The Social Revolution and Web 3.0?

I want to state at the outset that I am not against technological innovation. Furthermore, I do not fear change. I celebrate progress and embrace the positive impact it brings to our lives. Similarly, I anticipate a better quality of life in the  years to come through an acceleration of research and development. I make my living by helping others use and invest in new inventions; therefore, I have an interest in continued progress.

Nevertheless, I see something along the horizon that gives me pause for thought. Since the Arab Spring and Occupy Wall  Street (OWS), we’ve heard a lot about the social revolution. Facebook, Twitter and other social tools have had a transformative effect on the political scene. My purpose is not to assess the merits of these social movements, but they achieved what the United States, with all its weapons, money and allies never dared envision. Like it or not, they have also transformed our own politics. Every politician now speaks TEA Party and OWS language fluently regardless of their actual positions.

These developments have not gone unnoticed in the business world. For example, major software vendors are now discuss the merits of social media for completing tasks. I’m not absolutely certain what they mean by that, but it may be instructive to consider what they meant when they discussed unified communication and collaboration (UCC) a few years ago. They meant that businesses should support the way their knowledge workers spread information. Consequently, if your employees used instant messaging, you gave them an instant messenger. Instant messaging was old hat long time ago, but I used it to illustrate my point.

Currently, we use Facebook and Twitter with a variety of other tools to transmit and receive information. Recently, I read an article by Andrew Keen, in which he described 2012 as the year of Google’s possible demise.[1] He attributed this development to Web 3.0, Facebook and the social revolution. He also described the mash-up technologies we used in Web 2.0 (e.g., YouTube and Google Maps).

I’d like to deliver my own speculation. If Web 3.0 has arrived, it won’t survive long. Web 4.0 and several subsequent versions will probably replace it well before we reach the end of this decade. We’ll quickly move beyond anything we have yet to imagine, and the pace of change will accelerate. The greatest challenge I see ahead is our ability to cope with the growing volume of change. Remember Future Shock?

I’ve speculated elsewhere that even the earliest adopters will struggle to keep up with these changes. I believe that’s true, but I don’t think we have to feel overwhelmed or give up in despair. I’d like to repeat some advice I’ve previously delivered: remain true to your passions, stay loosely tied to technology and tightly couple your work with proven theory, sound practices and a liberated imagination.

References

[1]Keen, Andrew (March 30, 2012). Opinion: Is the social web an asteroid for the Google dinosaur? Retrieved on March 31, 2012 from http://www.cnn.com/2012/03/30/opinion/keen-google-social-media/index.html?hpt=hp_c3.